Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

Langer Grogan & Diver honored with Antitrust Enforcement Award for Landmark Sports Broadcasting Actions against MLB and NHL

Langer Grogan & Diver honored with Antitrust Enforcement Award for Landmark Sports Broadcasting Actions against MLB and NHL

The American Antitrust Institute (AAI) announced today that Langer Grogan & Diver partners Edward Diver, Howard Langer and Peter Leckman have been honored for Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice for their work on two major sports broadcasting cases: Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball and Laumann v. National Hockey League.

Law360: $200M MLB Antitrust Deal Cutting Cost of Web Streams OK’d

Law360: $200M MLB Antitrust Deal Cutting Cost of Web Streams OK’d

Law360’s Pete Brush reports on the $200M MLB Antitrust Deal Cutting Cost of Web Streams OK’d. Manhattan U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin gave final approval Monday for an antitrust class action deal worth $200 million that drops the price Major League Baseball junkies pay to watch online, awarding $16.5 million to plaintiffs’ counsel and turning aside an objector who said the settlement gives no relief for those who have stopped watching.

Law 360: MLB Fans Get Initial OK For TV Antitrust Settlement

Law 360: MLB Fans Get Initial OK For TV Antitrust Settlement

Law360’s Jeff Zelesin reports that MLB Fans Get Initial OK for TV Antitrust Settlement. Major League Baseball fans who were taking the league to trial over its business model for out-of-market game broadcasts won a New York federal judge’s initial approval Friday to settle the antitrust class action in exchange for some new viewing options and discounts.

Law 360: MLB Ripped For Shot At ‘Antitrust Titan’ In Blackout Suit

Law 360: MLB Ripped For Shot At ‘Antitrust Titan’ In Blackout Suit

Law 360’s Benjamin Horney reports in MLB Ripped For Shot At ‘Antitrust Titan’ In Blackout Suit that Pay-TV subscribers suing their providers and the MLB over blackout rules have urged a New York federal Judge to reject an attempt to block testimony from an expert witness hailed by other courts as an “antitrust titan,” claiming he serves to quantify the impact of the allegedly improper conduct.